DeepSeek V4 Pro coding benchmark
DeepSeek · API model DeepSeek-V4-Pro · Results published 25 Oct 2026 · Benchmark v4
How DeepSeek V4 Pro performed
DeepSeek V4 Pro by DeepSeek took the PomBench AI coding benchmark: every model gets the same prompt and writes self-contained browser code for a twelve-second scene: a Pomeranian runs across a backyard, jumps a puddle, enters its doghouse, retrieves a bone and turns toward the viewer. The video above is an independent offline browser recording of the code DeepSeek V4 Pro returned, captured at 960 × 540 and 30 fps, with no organizer edits to the code.
In this DeepSeek V4 Pro coding test the model produced 5,244 output tokens, including provider-reported reasoning (rank 32 of 46 by output tokens), and a verified API price is unavailable for this run, so no cost is shown. Is DeepSeek V4 Pro good at coding? One task cannot answer that on its own, so this LLM coding benchmark lets you watch the result instead of reading a score: check the gait, the puddle jump and reflection, the doorway occlusion and whether the bone stays in the dog's mouth.
Then compare DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-5.5 below, or open the AI model comparison to play up to four models on one synchronized timeline.
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GPT-5.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 5,244 vs 8,357 output tokens; known API cost unavailable vs $0.0106. Watch side by side
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.5: 5,244 vs 3,844 output tokens; known API cost unavailable vs $0.1255. Watch side by side
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5: 5,244 vs 3,499 output tokens; known API cost unavailable vs $0.0294. Watch side by side
DeepSeek V4 Pro code
DeepSeek V4 Pro wrote its own native browser animation code from the same prompt as every other model. One execution repair is available for empty, truncated or unexecutable code; the final response is kept, not a best-of selection.