DeepSeek V4.1 Flash coding benchmark
DeepSeek · API model DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · Results published 25 Oct 2026 · Benchmark v4
How DeepSeek V4.1 Flash performed
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash by DeepSeek took the PomBench AI coding benchmark: every model gets the same prompt and writes self-contained browser code for a twelve-second scene: a Pomeranian runs across a backyard, jumps a puddle, enters its doghouse, retrieves a bone and turns toward the viewer. The video above is an independent offline browser recording of the code DeepSeek V4.1 Flash returned, captured at 960 × 540 and 30 fps, with no organizer edits to the code.
In this DeepSeek V4.1 Flash coding test the model produced 8,357 output tokens, including provider-reported reasoning (rank 23 of 46 by output tokens), and the known API cost was $0.0106 (rank 12 of 45, cheapest first). Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash good at coding? One task cannot answer that on its own, so this LLM coding benchmark lets you watch the result instead of reading a score: check the gait, the puddle jump and reflection, the doorway occlusion and whether the bone stays in the dog's mouth.
Then compare DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro and GPT-6 Astra below, or open the AI model comparison to play up to four models on one synchronized timeline.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro, GPT-6 Astra and Gemini 3.8 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: 8,357 vs 5,244 output tokens; known API cost $0.0106 vs unavailable. Watch side by side
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra: 8,357 vs 10,275 output tokens; known API cost $0.0106 vs $0.5391. Watch side by side
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: 8,357 vs 11,345 output tokens; known API cost $0.0106 vs $0.0441. Watch side by side
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash code
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash wrote its own native browser animation code from the same prompt as every other model. One execution repair is available for empty, truncated or unexecutable code; the final response is kept, not a best-of selection.