Mistral Large 4 coding benchmark
Mistral AI · API model mistralai/mistral-large-4-0 · via OpenRouter · Results published 25 Oct 2026 · Benchmark v4
How Mistral Large 4 performed
Mistral Large 4 by Mistral AI took the PomBench AI coding benchmark: every model gets the same prompt and writes self-contained browser code for a twelve-second scene: a Pomeranian runs across a backyard, jumps a puddle, enters its doghouse, retrieves a bone and turns toward the viewer. The video above is an independent offline browser recording of the code Mistral Large 4 returned, captured at 960 × 540 and 30 fps, with no organizer edits to the code.
In this Mistral Large 4 coding test the model produced 175,024 output tokens, including provider-reported reasoning (rank 1 of 46 by output tokens), and the known API cost was $0.7578 (rank 43 of 45, cheapest first). Is Mistral Large 4 good at coding? One task cannot answer that on its own, so this LLM coding benchmark lets you watch the result instead of reading a score: check the gait, the puddle jump and reflection, the doorway occlusion and whether the bone stays in the dog's mouth. This run was served through OpenRouter with one fixed upstream provider and fallbacks disabled.
Then compare Mistral Large 4 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mistral Large 3 below, or open the AI model comparison to play up to four models on one synchronized timeline.
Mistral Large 4 vs Mistral Medium 3.5, Mistral Large 3 and Claude Haiku 5.5
- Mistral Large 4 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: 175,024 vs 3,499 output tokens; known API cost $0.7578 vs $0.0294. Watch side by side
- Mistral Large 4 vs Mistral Large 3: 175,024 vs 5,448 output tokens; known API cost $0.7578 vs $0.0092. Watch side by side
- Mistral Large 4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5: 175,024 vs 8,664 output tokens; known API cost $0.7578 vs $0.0047. Watch side by side
Mistral Large 4 code
Mistral Large 4 wrote its own native browser animation code from the same prompt as every other model. One execution repair is available for empty, truncated or unexecutable code; the final response is kept, not a best-of selection.