MAI-Thinking-1 coding benchmark
Microsoft · API model MAI-Thinking-1 · Results published 25 Oct 2026 · Benchmark v4
How MAI-Thinking-1 performed
MAI-Thinking-1 by Microsoft took the PomBench AI coding benchmark: every model gets the same prompt and writes self-contained browser code for a twelve-second scene: a Pomeranian runs across a backyard, jumps a puddle, enters its doghouse, retrieves a bone and turns toward the viewer. The video above is an independent offline browser recording of the code MAI-Thinking-1 returned, captured at 960 × 540 and 30 fps, with no organizer edits to the code.
In this MAI-Thinking-1 coding test the model produced 11,089 output tokens, including provider-reported reasoning (rank 16 of 46 by output tokens), and the known API cost was $0.0928 (rank 25 of 45, cheapest first). Is MAI-Thinking-1 good at coding? One task cannot answer that on its own, so this LLM coding benchmark lets you watch the result instead of reading a score: check the gait, the puddle jump and reflection, the doorway occlusion and whether the bone stays in the dog's mouth.
Then compare MAI-Thinking-1 vs Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash below, or open the AI model comparison to play up to four models on one synchronized timeline.
MAI-Thinking-1 vs Claude Opus 5, Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-6 Astra
- MAI-Thinking-1 vs Claude Opus 5: 11,089 vs 57,376 output tokens; known API cost $0.0928 vs $1.4689. Watch side by side
- MAI-Thinking-1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: 11,089 vs 11,345 output tokens; known API cost $0.0928 vs $0.0441. Watch side by side
- MAI-Thinking-1 vs GPT-6 Astra: 11,089 vs 10,275 output tokens; known API cost $0.0928 vs $0.5391. Watch side by side
MAI-Thinking-1 code
MAI-Thinking-1 wrote its own native browser animation code from the same prompt as every other model. One execution repair is available for empty, truncated or unexecutable code; the final response is kept, not a best-of selection.